Source: International Herald TribunePerhaps following the success of the live CNN/YouTube debate involving US Democratic presidential candidates last month, music channel MTV and popular online social network MySpace.com have partnered to host an innovative discussion session aimed at young people. Using email, SMS and instant messaging, young voters will be able to submit their questions to candidates in eleven one-hour slots from September to December 2007.
According to MTV spokesman Ian Rowe, 'This is not a debate. Each one of these dialogues is an opportunity for young people both on a college campus - as well as millions watching via a live stream on MySpace and MTV.com - to have one-on-one, direct, unfiltered conversation with each candidate'.
Democratic candidates who have agreed to take part are: John Edwards, Hilary Clinton, Christopher Dodd, Barack Obama and Bill Richardson.
Republican candidates who have agreed to take part are: Rudy Giuliani, Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter, John McCain, Sam Brownback and Mitt Romney.
Although this is a non-partisan event, this is a good example of how 'long tail' principles can be applied to political communications, and is the kind of thing I have always advocated for political parties. For example, if a party creates a forum where young people can come to discuss politics, and engage openly and meaningfully with politicians, when those young people come to vote they will remember that that particular party gave them the best opportunities to engage.
Labels: Barack Obama, Democrats, Hilary Clinton, John Edwards, John McCain, MTV, MySpace, Presidential election, Republicans, Rudy Giuliani
Increasingly, MPs without decent web presences, in most-developed countries at least, are looking like they don’t understand the 21st century communications environment that we live in. A few years ago, the web could have been passed off as a fad but with higher than ever internet penetration rates around the world and signs of political apathy in richer countries, it’s a better time than any for MPs and other representatives to get online and to do it well.
Here are a few tips for MPs (or their staff/researchers) on how to get the most out of their website/blog/YouTube channel (etc.):
People don’t just vote at election time!
You need to show your constituents and electorate that you’re serving them year-round, not just around election time. Try to regularly update your website with news about things you have done to serve them. Include pictures, videos or audio and you won’t seem so distant.
Allow constituents to use your website as a sounding off board
You ran for election to serve your constituents, so don’t just listen to them when you’re at home in your area. Set up a section of your website which allows local constituents to let their elected representative know about issues that concern them. And don’t just stop there. Answer their concerns, and tell them what you have done/will do to solve the issue.
Publicise national campaigns on your local website
National campaigns from any party affect people on a local level, including your constituents. If your party is running a national campaign about an issue (for example, the ban on smoking, a recent example from the UK), publicise it on your website in a high-profile spot.
Keep design simple and accessible
You want as many people as possible to use your website without having any accessibility issues. To this end, don’t be tempted to use flash animation, lots of javascript or anything else which may hinder the user’s experience. Keep design fresh and simple, not cluttered and fancy.
Tune your website for search engine visibility
If someone types in the name of the area your represent into a search engine, your website should ideally come very close to the top. When selecting a domain name, try to include the name of your constituency, and/or any major towns in that area in the domain name. For example, if your constituency was called ‘Salford’, and your name was Hazel Blears, hazelblearsforsalford.co.uk would really help your search engine visibility for people looking for local information.
As we all know, US presidential candidates are all pretty much sold on the 'e-campaigns thing'. They have so far been using blogs, YouTube, MySpace & Facebook amongst others to promote their message and ask the electorate for votes. Some candidates' web teams are realising the power of AdWords campaigning, as candidate names are beginning to appear in that familiar ads window to the right of normal search results.
Wired.com did a test on the keywords that bring up candidates' ads. One search they tried was 'Giuliani divorce', which amusingly did bring up the official Giuliani ad.
Using AdWords for politicians and political parties is a good idea. It is cheap, near universal in reach and can be targeted very precisely to specific keywords. For the equivalent of a few hundred pounds a year, parties can attract visitors who want specific information, which could lead to higher membership uptake via the web and allow parties to directly communicate with people who have expressed an interest, via their Google search.
Labels: adwords, Giuliani, Google, SEO
Source: Haaretz (haaretz.com)Here’s another initiative from a country that wouldn’t immediately jump to mind when talking about use of the internet in politics. Isreal’s Knesset (national parliament) has an online shadow, Knesset II – www.knesset2.co.il, which is being used to grab the attention of members of the real Knesset. Although the site isn’t an official project of Israel’s parliament, this is a very interesting way to invite normal people to get involved in the work of the legislature.
Anyone who registers on the site can propose bills, discuss them and participate in voting on them ‘without primaries, without elections and without kissing the babies of central committee members’, that’s according to the site founders. Among existing bill proposals are a proposal to supervise the prices of apartment rentals, and the so-called ‘big recycling law’.
I generally think that projects like this do no harm, and can only help to spark the interest of people who wouldn’t normally be interested in politics. There are naysayers though; Dr. Mike Dahan a lecturer in communications at the Sapir College in the Negev and Bar-Llan University says ‘It works better in the United States because there the political culture is different and closer to direct democracy,’ he says. ‘In Israel, the belief that the Web will strengthen the connection with party leaders is generally dashed because it is not at all certain that most of them actually want this kind of relationship.’ I don’t know Dr. Mike, but I’d say that politicians who ignore the internet do so at their peril, and sooner or later they won’t have much of a choice to engage, that is if they want to win elections.
It would be interesting to see how a project like this would work in a country like the UK, France or America.
Labels: Israel, Knesset, Knesset 2, shadow parliament
Labels: downing street, Gordon Brown, Number 10
The Tories have launched 'Stand Up Speak Up', its effort to solicit some online engagement to form its next election manifesto. On the surface, the process is in three parts: 1) read reports from policy commissions, 2) vote on policy ideas & 3) debate to have your say.It's quite an intuitive system. You can choose to read a particular part of a policy report depending on the time you have available, five minutes (brief overview), fifteen minutes (whole summary report) etc. Once you have read the report you are taken to the next screen, where you can vote on policy initiatives. For example, under the 'Aid' policy banner, you can tick three out of seven options, including to 'Pledge half the increase in aid to Africa' or 'Make grants rather than loans to poor countries'.
It's clearly a good idea to invite your members, and the wider public to help you decide on future party policies. Having said that, users are being presented with a limited list of policy options, so it isn't as open as it could be.
Labels: Conservatives, David Cameron, online consultation, policy review, tories
This is a good strategy for Downing Street, as it will provide interesting & useful information not just to Arabic, French & Spanish speakers worldwide (which together with English should allow most people in the world at least to understand), but is also a resource for immigrants in the UK whose English is lacking. Saying that however, the content is mainly contextual and historical, rather than a guide to how to interact with government.
Each language mini-site provides the following translated content:
- PM's biography
- Biographies of Cabinet
- Legislative procedure
- Guide explaining the make-up of the government
- History of No. 10
- Historical biographies of former Prime Ministers
The White House website has long provided Spanish as an option for readers, but that seems more appropriate in a country where a large portion of the population speaks Spanish as a first, or joint first language. The Elysee Palace website also provides translations in English, German & Spanish.
View number10.gov.uk in Arabic | French | Spanish
Labels: Arabic, downing street, French, Gordon Brown, Number 10, Spanish


